From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5420 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2011 13:04:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5402 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2011 13:04:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_GJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:04:03 +0000 Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so1666986pwi.0 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.52.8 with SMTP id z8mr1767728wfz.401.1302267843114; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:04:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.50.10 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:03:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk To: Andreas Schwab Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 08:57, Andreas Schwab wrote: > That's how it should have been in the first place. That's no reason, it's an opinion. If the current code works there is no reason to change anything.