From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-8821-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12675 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2006 17:16:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 12659 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2006 17:16:54 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.144)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:16:52 +0000
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236])
	by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0UHGoJe030607
	for <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:50 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215])
	by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k0UHGnqU145746
	for <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:50 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0UHGnr7029534
	for <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:49 -0500
Received: from d27mc103.rchland.ibm.com (d27mc103.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.229.52])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0UHGnec029500;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20060130164109.GO4625@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>,
        Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc ulps fixes
From: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OFB46E2CCA.5DE5C177-ON86257106.005E6BB4-86257106.005EED7C@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:16:00 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>  wrote on 01/30/2006 10:41:09 AM:

> Hi!
> 
> I think it is better to merge ulps results rather than regenerate, that 
way
> we don't suddenly start getting many errors when using slightly older
> compilers.
> Also, I think it is a bad idea to put
> ldouble: 17987982955981951215498976719132
> and similar into the libm-test-ulps file, only the ulps we want to 
tolerate
> (< 10, < 12 or something like that).
> 

I have a patch coming that fixes the underlying problems and the ppc ulps 
file. I'll send it as soon we complete the internal review.


Steven J. Munroe
Linux on Power Toolchain Architect
IBM Corporation, Linux Technology Center