From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) Cc: Thorsten Kukuk , libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: rlimit changes Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 07:56:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <19991210162833.A19371@Wotan.suse.de> X-SW-Source: 1999-12/msg00035.html Ulrich Drepper writes: |> Wel, then make the changes to the SPARC tree. But since there is no |> ugetrlimit syscalls the question is whether it was wanted there at |> all. The x86 is a special case since it actually allows 4GB memory |> and more. Is this true for SPARC? If not the kernel change is not |> necessary at all and *will* (note: future tense!!!) be changed back. SUS2 says that rlim_t is unsigned. Will you ignore that? This has nothing to do with the kernel. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg