From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-6319-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10790 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2003 12:55:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10689 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2003 12:55:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2003 12:55:50 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5FC941435E; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:55:50 +0100 (MET)
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: make check failure on x86-64 with abilist
X-Yow: I guess it was all a DREAM..  or an episode of HAWAII FIVE-O...
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:29:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <hoof47sfzp.fsf@byrd.suse.de> (Andreas Jaeger's message of
 "Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:22:34 +0100")
Message-ID: <jeadfrms6i.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50
References: <200303191053.h2JArvj24287@magilla.sf.frob.com>
	<ho8yvbtya5.fsf@byrd.suse.de> <jefzpjmwxa.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<hoof47sfzp.fsf@byrd.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2

Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

|> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
|> 
|> > Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
|> >
|> > |> 2003-03-19  Andreas Jaeger  <aj@suse.de>
|> > |> 
|> > |> 	* intl/Versions: Make _nl_msg_cat_cntr,  _nl_default_dirname and
|> > |> 	_nl_domain_bindings as private.
|> >
|> > I don't think you can make _nl_msg_cat_cntr private, it was once part of
|> > the libintl ABI (see revision 1.12 of intl/libintl.h).
|> 
|> Can we make the other two private?

Yes, I think we can.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."