From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3009 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2011 12:57:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 2991 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2011 12:57:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GJ,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:57:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p38CvFYe023683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:57:15 -0400 Received: from hase (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p38CvEYn013114; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:57:15 -0400 From: Andreas Schwab To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move __fortify_fail call out of line in x86 ____longjmp_chk References: X-Yow: I'm a fuschia bowling ball somewhere in Brittany Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Ulrich Drepper's message of "Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:48:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 That's how it should have been in the first place. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."