From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-hacker-return-8190-listarch-libc-hacker=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16535 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2005 17:13:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-hacker-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-hacker-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16519 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 17:13:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 17:13:39 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4E12FE841;
	Sat,  8 Jan 2005 18:13:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aj by arthur.inka.de with local (Exim 4.42)
	id 1CnK9h-000306-ED; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:13:37 +0100
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Glibc hackers <libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes for make clean (take 2)
References: <m3sm5ibwe5.fsf@gromit.moeb>
	<20050107124425.GB17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
	<m3brc12veq.fsf@gromit.moeb>
	<20050108163855.GD17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
	<m3zmzjx3vw.fsf@gromit.moeb>
	<20050108170445.GE17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:13:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20050108170445.GE17169@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> (Jakub Jelinek's
	message of "Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:04:45 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3fz1bx2ri.fsf@gromit.moeb>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
	Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 851

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 05:49:23PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > This seems to work for me:
>>=20
>> But why is it necessary?  Why are we using both
>> tests: $(objpfx)some-test.out
>> and
>> tests +=3D other-test
>>=20
>> Only the later should be needed AFAIK,
>
> tst-pie1 needs a special rule, because the general rule for building
> tests is unsuitable for building PIE binaries.

Yeah - a special rule not only for execution but also for building.
Now I see...

> If you have the special rule and tests +=3D tst-pie1, then you get the
> make warnings about overriding targets.

Thanks,
Andreas
--=20
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint =3D 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-length: 188

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBB4BTBOJpWPMJyoSYRAuWvAJ9YeopGnbgvHt7csPsikAJOSxAxbgCcC1cT
K6viC4iZoYN84v/S9tuTF0c=
=KAwQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--