From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3785 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2010 15:42:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 3764 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2010 15:42:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:42:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9QFgXrL001028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:42:33 -0400 Received: from hase.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9QFgVOs014013; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:42:32 -0400 From: Andreas Schwab To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't require DNS labels to be host names References: X-Yow: .. My pants just went on a wild rampage through a Long Island Bowling Alley!! Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Ulrich Drepper's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:24:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact libc-hacker-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-hacker-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 Ulrich Drepper writes: > Invalid extensions by msft What does this have to do with msft? > Therefore the question: how did you come up with the patch? By fixing the bug described in the bug report. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."