Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>
>> @@ -1371,6 +1372,36 @@ EOF
>>  
>>    AC_SUBST(libc_cv_fpie)
>>  fi
>> +
>> +if test $elf != yes; then
>> +  AC_CACHE_CHECK(for .init and .fini sections, libc_cv_have_initfini,
>> +		 [AC_TRY_COMPILE(, [asm (".section .init");
>> +				    asm (".section .fini");
>> +				    asm ("${libc_cv_dot_text}");],
>> +				 libc_cv_have_initfini=yes,
>> +				 libc_cv_have_initfini=no)])
>> +  AC_SUBST(libc_cv_have_initfini)dnl
>> +  if test $libc_cv_have_initfini = yes; then
>> +    AC_DEFINE(HAVE_INITFINI)
>> +  fi
>> +fi
>
> This looks bogus.

You're right - this part should be removed, I seemed to have copied
too much :-(

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126