> -----Original Message-----
> From: sundeep.kokkonda@gmail.com <sundeep.kokkonda@gmail.com>
> Sent: 08 July 2022 10:20
> To: 'Adhemerval Zanella' <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> Cc: 'Libc-help' <libc-help@sourceware.org>
> Subject: RE: glibc test procedure needed
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> > Sent: 05 July 2022 18:13
> > To: sundeep.kokkonda@gmail.com
> > Cc: Libc-help <libc-help@sourceware.org>
> > Subject: Re: glibc test procedure needed
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 5 Jul 2022, at 03:09, sundeep.kokkonda--- via Libc-alpha <libc-
> > alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I need some info on glibc testing.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In the Yocto project we're updating glibc frequently and so we need
> > > to ensure the updated glibc is not introduced any issues, by
> > > performing the testing.
> > >
> > > Can you let me know how can I test glibc? Is there any standardized
> > > test procedure available to do full test/regression test?
> > >
> >
> > The usual ‘make check’ should cover all the required testing, you
> > might need to use ‘run-built-tests=yes’ additional directive if you
> > are cross-compiling to force the make to issues the built tests (for
> > instance on architecture that support multiple ABI, like x86, or to force the use
> of some emulation like qemu-user).
> >
> > We are still fixing up some clunky tests and there are some broken
> > environment (for instance broken syscall filtering) where some tests might
> advertise a failure.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I tried with 'Testing with a cross-compiler' method and test is aborted when the
> flag '-Wformat-security' is enabled. When this flag is removed the test is
> executed successfully. Is it a known issue? (The error log make-check.out is
> attached for reference) Also, can anyone share the list of known test failures (if
> any).
> 

Hello,

Can I get some info regarding my query.

> 
> Thanks,
> Sundeep K.