> On 28 Jul 2023, at 14:06, lob via Libc-help wrote: > > Hi there. > > I have been playing with "msort.c", the primary implementation of the > standard library qsort() function. I have a trivial change that > nevertheless speeds it up by up to 10%. It seems to me that this > would be a cheap but impactful improvement. > > Unfortunately I lack the resources or wherewithal to follow the > procedure outlined at > [https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist], to build > and test the entire library. Would it be possible to have an existing > contributor submit the patch on my behalf? Hi, My plan for next release is in fact to remove mergesort implementation from qsort [1]. The cover-letter from the patchset has the rationale of why to remove it. [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=22547