From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Received: from mail.tuxteam.de (mail.tuxteam.de [5.199.139.25])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 369D7385703F
 for <libc-help@sourceware.org>; Sun, 23 May 2021 15:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 369D7385703F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tuxteam.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tomas@tuxteam.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de;
 s=mail; 
 h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=X5OMAKLsIj8lKk/aNuAOXrmhQwIG3yp0d4HaYK7sP1I=; 
 b=TLLk21U2LkY+sPb0q+vdHvaPnPReBPYcG+WU8UXMEMfU1myZJhWHVIGIfNSOzjwFj5n5ZXxJWo7vL8yqCsSnm9XlH9hQodaTYKNI7260OQ07Xox0gvYAHGGisMZ1RmiJSOlg0tWIGvNN1my2JWXOx7sh2qq6WeBfNH6QUuNxmm8ctU9GUKzQ01TZVZWdbSdzyNVUlUQTuRCRbxPfxgsHeQVzDu5lSpCp1nZGedqkONRhIcIWFeG3BW6KwBo/DGoZJYQanv+1UaDoxb2NYUkf8eZZntLujz7XWXsczo09HBVyM66vx7Y277xbvPO+n+n51UorUa0xOGDrKOIJH9czrQ==;
Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <tomas@tuxteam.de>)
 id 1lkqFc-0005xH-2F; Sun, 23 May 2021 17:42:48 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 17:42:48 +0200
From: tomas@tuxteam.de
To: Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: http://manpagez.com/man/3/regex/
Message-ID: <20210523154247.GC18845@tuxteam.de>
References: <CABrM6wkT2stxp+FE6g7qzVOqNN08XPME865S3KpuhcQ=D7ZPvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210523140555.GA18845@tuxteam.de>
 <CABrM6w=M7RoALKPr-+GppHpuLy0hpXm1JpEU7JG84AA9FL55aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210523151237.GB18845@tuxteam.de>
 <CABrM6wk9D8yEYUZg-jMPVr1OXEuMSXex6O0vKtrrhR3K5ekTjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABrM6wk9D8yEYUZg-jMPVr1OXEuMSXex6O0vKtrrhR3K5ekTjg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-help mailing list <libc-help.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-help>,
 <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-help>,
 <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 15:42:50 -0000


--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:35:21AM -0500, Peng Yu wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>=20
> I've already read it before I sent the first email. My conclusion is that
> glibc regex doesn't support REG_ENHANCED. But the manual could be outdate=
d.
> So I want to confirm if it is the case.
>=20
> Again, I am not asking REG_EXTENDED. I am asking REG_ENHANCED.

Got it now. Sorry, I misread.

> If you don't want to asnwer my question specifically, then just don't
> asnwer. Please don't answer something that I did not ask. It is just a
> distraction.

Will do.

 - t

--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAmCqd/cACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYkewCfRgZj9ch/U7BGddinXyBv70mf
K8oAnizCj56ZkUnxWBZaic07Qj2y57Ei
=LXR7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1--