From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED6853940CD8 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:03:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org ED6853940CD8 Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id a8so2593223pjk.4 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=43/lAOZYJRT3rL1V5ubXRyWPx4LzbutYwHwx3EuUOec=; b=DFaC+iqB5JzxMAFP915/zoPnE56kZ+8IiT9P85WofGlJDUCIIBj+BEBvc6JVu2Go1x O424EOmq3N9ugykbIuuAbko2G4jFIJPNah2uUlkeoOOsc4KAON2p6WiDcmVL38Fq+gYO GE2Mb/YHLqE8lkCcy/VDfCWY/Lrs+vR0Ii5Hjny768q4RGYDrRZXmDHhQbfb986ArtNd GzyGeh6U5X/XdwblDuniPxFTN3T2BjW5vERSPvIvP6G7HVhaS8VQ+vhR+VAjdZgmgeky LP8qOpowr7biAWC7gWJP+ACI41EwL1lU6AHbdbK1bUKtnG6q/DSrUCC98duDm1Hu9O6X 1AAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kPjhgl349VA/WD2qdKrosW4elOJ99pIZuGw8Y431zRvQB/JuO KkbKU9CVxeGC0adv/2h952Y4T/iuM7A/fA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvtCTn9tQbqABmmhsN8/lJbWW6LdVCtsiLJJB6HGuHoUSNH6xXd1snY3U3gcnJdeq/XC9DQA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8d94:0:b029:3a0:a513:e13a with SMTP id i20-20020aa78d940000b02903a0a513e13amr27028442pfr.56.1628078598864; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:431:c7ca:76cd:ebc7:4201:855e:55a1? ([2804:431:c7ca:76cd:ebc7:4201:855e:55a1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm2443562pjo.51.2021.08.04.05.03.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 failed tests To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Michael Brunnbauer , libc-help@sourceware.org References: From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: <5f1ce02f-fa75-aa46-bd2f-16f64d210db3@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 09:03:16 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:03:21 -0000 On 04/08/2021 09:00, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:26 PM Adhemerval Zanella > wrote: >>> FAIL: malloc/tst-safe-linking >> >> Siddhesh has improved it to avoid some false positives, but from from >> the commit message it seems that although unlikely it might still be >> possible. Could you post the output to see if this is the case? > > I think Michael said he saw that failure in 2.33 and not on 2.34, > which is how it should be with my fix. > > Siddhesh > But the test was added only on 2.34 (assuming he is testing with the release package). Micheal, are you using the source package or some repository revision?