From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE813858C27 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:55:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9FE813858C27 Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-169-nakd2_vAMJu7oCRnerIvDg-1; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:55:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nakd2_vAMJu7oCRnerIvDg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA6B1044567; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.88]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B7DD465021; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:55:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: "Joachim Schmitz" Cc: , , , "'Shiva Subramanian'" , "'Bill Honaker'" Subject: Re: AW: AW: Re-port Intent for HPE NonStop (a.k.a. Tandem) References: <01ec01d836d7$f59d39a0$e0d7ace0$@nexbridge.com> <87k0cxynn8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <003901d8377b$32ab1e90$98015bb0$@schmitz-digital.de> <87czipylwg.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <003c01d83780$66105e80$32311b80$@schmitz-digital.de> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:55:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <003c01d83780$66105e80$32311b80$@schmitz-digital.de> (Joachim Schmitz's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:49:20 +0100") Message-ID: <874k40zzf1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:55:22 -0000 * Joachim Schmitz: > Not sure what you'd expect us to "release first", out compiler? > If so: sorry, that won't happen. We don't even own it ourself. > If we were able to port gcc, I believe we'd not be allowed to share it, due > to proprietary code needed inside, needed to support the extension out > platform needs. Understood, but if you want to even have to a chance at an official glibc port, you'd have to address these issues somehow. > If glibc can't be made POSIX complaint, then that's where everything is lost > for us, as far as I can tell. There might be a misunderstanding here. glibc is not layered on top of a POSIX interface, it itself is the POSIX interface for GNU systems. Thanks, Florian