From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21766 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2017 14:20:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-help-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-help-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21697 invoked by uid 89); 23 Oct 2017 14:20:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_1,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=idtype_t, lumby, Lumby, Apparently X-HELO: albireo.enyo.de Received: from albireo.enyo.de (HELO albireo.enyo.de) (5.158.152.32) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:20:45 +0000 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1e6das-0002sn-T8; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:20:42 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e6das-0003DD-Ou; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:20:42 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: John Lumby Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org Subject: Re: where is the definition of idtype_t supposed to live? References: <59E9D0C2.4090900@arm.com> <59E9DE7F.6010909@arm.com> <36695ee6-cfb3-3363-5827-94d52ca48e24@redhat.com> <59EA36D8.3030803@arm.com> <13d8a39e-4f33-4e11-0860-69870662c5a0@redhat.com> <87a80ix909.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (John Lumby's message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:14:42 +0000") Message-ID: <8760b6x7wl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 * John Lumby: > Thanks Florian, > > > > You need to look at gcc -E output to see where the compiling is > > picking up the definitions. > > > Yes I did that but my question was I thought pure glibc, distro-agnosti= c - > > after a make and make install into a install_root, where is the > definition of idtype_t supposed to be? > > (in that install_root, not in final distro layout) > > I don't think debian comes into it does it? Unless you are indicating > that make is influenced by distro choices? I checked the 2.24 sources, and glibc assumes idtype_t is defined in . =E2=80=9Cmake install=E2=80=9D assumes the path for that is /usr/include/sys/wait.h, but that's not correct if the system uses multi-arch paths. > > Please avoid posting new questions to existing thread in the future. > > Hmm, now I see from thread index that is what happened but why? I > thought changing the subj was enough. > I did compose as reply to get the email address correct, did it > somehow base on that? Yes, changing the subject is not sufficient. Apparently, you need to start a new message from scratch in your mail client, and paste the list address into that. Please keep the thread on the mailing list.