From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella Netto via Libc-help <libc-help@sourceware.org>,
Rain <glibc@sunshowers.io>
Subject: Re: posix_spawn: parent can get stuck in uninterruptible sleep if child receives SIGTSTP early enough
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:04:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d27vbdx.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c356365-34db-cc00-bb92-0e55e7a89118@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella Netto's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:32:47 -0300")
* Adhemerval Zanella Netto:
> On 22/08/22 15:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Adhemerval Zanella Netto via Libc-help:
>>
>>> Right, my mistake. I understood the issue better now, although I am
>>> still puzzled why SIGTSTP is only being triggered on sigprocmask (sing
>>> default action is still to stop PROCESS).
>>
>> I think it's a maskable stop, not an unmaskable one, like SIGSTOP.
>
> Yeah, we do block the signal on parent (internal_signal_block_all).
>
>>
>> This looks a vfork-specific bug that can't happen with fork. I don't
>> see how to fix it in a generic fashion because we can't unblock SIGTSTP
>> and launch the new process in an atomic fashion.
>
> We might ask for a new clone3 field to define the default signal mask on
> process start (and thus omit the final sigprocmask before execve).
It might already possible to fix this using io_uring. Unfortunately, I
didn't attend the LPC presentation.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-13 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-14 3:30 Rain
2022-08-14 3:38 ` Rain
2022-08-22 16:51 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-22 17:00 ` Rain
2022-08-22 17:48 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-22 18:21 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-22 18:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-22 22:28 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-09-13 10:04 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-09-21 15:24 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-09-22 12:18 ` Florian Weimer
2022-09-22 16:56 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-09-22 17:38 ` Florian Weimer
2022-09-22 19:14 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-10-10 13:45 ` Florian Weimer
2022-10-18 20:04 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-10-20 11:55 ` Florian Weimer
2022-10-21 1:40 ` Rain
2022-10-21 14:18 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2022-08-22 22:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d27vbdx.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=glibc@sunshowers.io \
--cc=libc-help@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).