From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0DD3857805
 for <libc-help@sourceware.org>; Mon,  9 May 2022 07:48:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DB0DD3857805
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-261-uIFD5fuHMDmaElvPCLl7MQ-1; Mon, 09 May 2022 03:48:32 -0400
X-MC-Unique: uIFD5fuHMDmaElvPCLl7MQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.4])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D9B811E75;
 Mon,  9 May 2022 07:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.246])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084A32024CBD;
 Mon,  9 May 2022 07:48:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Pablo Galindo Salgado via Libc-help <libc-help@sourceware.org>
Cc: Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablogsal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why the entries in the dynamic section are not always relocated?
References: <CAFjbc8HqHAtiXVQWv7r=O-gcw27bLy5FxxUaP2XUNOp-myTqjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 09:48:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAFjbc8HqHAtiXVQWv7r=O-gcw27bLy5FxxUaP2XUNOp-myTqjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (Pablo Galindo Salgado via Libc-help's message of "Sun, 8 May 2022
 08:04:13 +0100")
Message-ID: <877d6vdu42.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-help mailing list <libc-help.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-help>,
 <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-help>,
 <mailto:libc-help-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 07:48:37 -0000

* Pablo Galindo Salgado via Libc-help:

> I have noticed that when using dl_iterate_phdr to inspect some entries
> in the dynamic section of different shared libraries loaded into a
> program, the pointers are not always relocated (they are offset
> instead of full addresses).

I think this question has already been answered on the musl list:

  <https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2022/05/08/1>

Thanks,
Florian