From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412773858CDA
	for <libc-help@sourceware.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:31:52 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 412773858CDA
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=deneb.enyo.de
Received: from [172.17.203.2] (port=39339 helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by albireo.enyo.de ([172.17.140.2]) with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
	id 1od54H-007lkT-RL; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:31:49 +0000
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
	id 1od54H-0005u4-Ef; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:31:49 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Leo Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Cc: <libc-help@sourceware.org>,  <peterlin@andestech.com>,
  <dylan@andestech.com>,  <alankao@andestech.com>
Subject: Re: Is it reasonable to expect errno to be 0 when entering main?
References: <YzGWAjzz2OhxKTGL@ubuntu01> <87mtalz71b.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<YzKjAMjPIywq7tvI@ubuntu01>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:31:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <YzKjAMjPIywq7tvI@ubuntu01> (Leo Liang's message of "Tue, 27 Sep
	2022 07:15:12 +0000")
Message-ID: <87edvxz316.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-help.sourceware.org>

* Leo Liang:

> Besides, Do you have any suggestion as to how this could be fixed?
> We could try send out a patch as well!

Hiding the getrandom failure is probably sufficient.  All other
failures in malloc will lead to the process failing to start, so those
errors don't need to be masked.