From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F7D385483C for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:45:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 45F7D385483C Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-222-ry8yO_QgPyuovHtT09aldA-1; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:45:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ry8yO_QgPyuovHtT09aldA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C7D800D53; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-115-121.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.121]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9867019C66; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:45:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Ian Pilcher via Libc-help Cc: Ian Pilcher Subject: Re: Bug or not? printf allocates buffer & never frees it References: Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:45:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ian Pilcher via Libc-help's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:30:19 -0500") Message-ID: <87h7l91xnu.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:45:56 -0000 * Ian Pilcher via Libc-help: > Fedora 33 with glibc-2.32-4.fc33.x86_64. > > Simple reproducer: > > #include > #include > > int main(void) > { > mtrace(); > printf("%d\n", 0); > muntrace(); > return 0; > } > > Running with MALLOC_TRACE set shows: > > Memory not freed: > ----------------- > Address Size Caller > 0x0000000000e1d690 0x400 at 0x7f19511d2934 > Is this considered a bug? What happens if you remove the muntrace call? I suspect you see this leak because you are specifically telling glibc not to log the deallocation. Thanks, Florian