From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=M8BC=E4=redhat.com=fweimer@sourceware.org>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545853858D3C
	for <libc-help@sourceware.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:50:06 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 545853858D3C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1694530206;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=T2ZY38qZYJH5mU+nf0N9wQOqlGy05WkEAnT7tG6W/uM=;
	b=c6hxq1y9EuuLiyj/avnKg/hOkQ3JdP/s+kVIh1YnbiQXXVNJndfUjdA1S72IJcsQroligV
	3CsB5Nub9evAIVzVk5BLZQTEMXlhWX9nelKqJu7YweY3VTZjiMAR7Y2ExurFLQ4YrZu3E2
	bdycof5qZWz4MSGYRKs5J54sbv8ZhUQ=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73])
 by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-52-DscMrPPiPsWg8hS350zxOw-1; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:50:04 -0400
X-MC-Unique: DscMrPPiPsWg8hS350zxOw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E5829AB435;
	Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.67])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795B72026D4B;
	Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Matthias Fulz <mfulz@olznet.de>
Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Idea / Patch to add very simple uid filtering to resolv.conf
References: <2a1c4925-7ad4-4673-9954-72d556d0b8f1@olznet.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 16:50:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2a1c4925-7ad4-4673-9954-72d556d0b8f1@olznet.de> (Matthias Fulz's
	message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2023 14:25:16 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r0n35tut.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-help.sourceware.org>

* Matthias Fulz:

> Further if the uid is not added to the line the behavior would be the
> same as it was before the patch.
> Would be nice if this could be included, or at least please explain
> why not for my understanding as I can't see any reason that would be
> against it

It's complexity we'd have to maintain.  It also breaks in case processes
switch to some other for increased isolation (perhaps with user
namespaces).

I recommend the separate service module approach.

Thanks,
Florian