public inbox for libc-help@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Bading <tbading@web.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org, Godmar Back <godmar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (stat(...) == -1 || faccessat(...) == -1) && errno == EINTR ?!??
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:43:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a591e0e-33bb-7518-5e31-42f0545a940e@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czx1fzun.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

 > Returning EINTR in stat would allow relatively straightforward
 > implementation of a timeout, in case the path resides on a network file
 > system and the server is unreachable.  So it's not a completely
 > unreasonable thing to do.

Good point.

 > On the other hand, the cost in lost backwards
 > compatibility with applications that do not know about this behavior
 > appears to be pretty high, as this thread shows.

What's your interpretation of the POSIX standard? Does it permit such a
backwards compatibility breaking change?

Tobias


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-15  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-14 11:13 Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 12:18 ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 13:17   ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 15:14     ` Godmar Back
2021-02-14 15:20       ` Godmar Back
2021-02-14 17:30       ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 22:04         ` Godmar Back
2021-02-15  9:15           ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-15  9:24             ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-15  9:43               ` Tobias Bading [this message]
2021-02-15  9:45                 ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-15 10:02                   ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-15 10:20                     ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-15 10:36                       ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-15  8:33         ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-15  8:45           ` Konstantin Kharlamov
2021-02-15 10:25             ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 17:56   ` Konstantin Kharlamov
2021-02-14 18:58     ` Tobias Bading
2021-02-14 20:46       ` Konstantin Kharlamov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a591e0e-33bb-7518-5e31-42f0545a940e@web.de \
    --to=tbading@web.de \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=godmar@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-help@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).