public inbox for libc-help@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: glibc-hwcaps for armv7 (neon-vfpv4)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:30:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90243b3d-740a-f391-089e-45d5ada7096f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+7wUsxAzBoOAuY7rZ09cQcgUHqA3U=P5mtBOm6+fN1avn6owg@mail.gmail.com>



On 31/08/23 09:08, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi Florian !
> 
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 1:24 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> * Mathieu Malaterre:
>>
>>> Dear glibc maintainer,
>>>
>>> I fail to understand the ld.so man page (Debian/sid version: man-pages
>>> 6.03) for hwcaps support. Specifically I'd like to install a shared
>>> lib on a Debian/armhf system (baseline is neon-less) which was build
>>> with gcc option:
>>>
>>>   -march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon-vfpv4
>>>
>>> What subfolder should I be using ?
>>
>> You can use “LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. /bin/true” to see which subdirectories
>> are probed.  I think either neon/vfp or vfp/neon should be among the
>> subdirectories.  This functionality has since been removed from upstream
>> glibc because it sometimes results in hundereds of extra openat system
>> calls.
> 
> oh, thanks for the trick. Could you confirm my conclusion below
> (Debian/i386 sid system):
> 
> % file /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/libx264.so.164
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/libx264.so.164: ELF 32-bit LSB
> shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked,
> BuildID[sha1]=e66974d10aef77af7ed504266cde974d103484d6, stripped
> 
> However:
> 
> % /sbin/ldconfig -v 2>/dev/null | grep -A3 hwcap
> -> nothing
> 
> same goes with:
> 
> % LD_DEBUG=libs LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. /bin/true
>    3327956:     find library=libc.so.6 [0]; searching
>    3327956:      search path=.          (LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
>    3327956:       trying file=./libc.so.6
>    3327956:      search cache=/etc/ld.so.cache
>    3327956:       trying file=/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     calling init: /lib/ld-linux.so.2
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     calling init: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     initialize program: /bin/true
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     transferring control: /bin/true
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     calling fini:  [0]
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     calling fini: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 [0]
>    3327956:
>    3327956:
>    3327956:     calling fini: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [0]
>    3327956:
> 
> 
> If I understand correctly the file
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/libx264.so.164 cannot be used on
> Debian/sid/i386 system since libc used is:
> 
> % /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> GNU C Library (Debian GLIBC 2.37-7) stable release version 2.37.
> Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
> There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
> PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> Compiled by GNU CC version 12.3.0.
> libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC ABSOLUTE
> Minimum supported kernel: 3.2.0
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>.

From your system configuration, it seems so.  On a ubuntu22 I see:

$ find /usr/ -iname libx264.so*
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libx264.so.163
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2/libx264.so.163
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libx264.so.163
$ /sbin/ldconfig -v 2>/dev/null | grep -A3 hwcap
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686: (hwcap: 0x0002000000000000) (from /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu.conf:3)
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/sse2: (hwcap: 0x0002000000000001) (from /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu.conf:3)
	libx264.so.163 -> libx264.so.163

$ cat /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu.conf
# Multiarch support
/usr/local/lib/i386-linux-gnu
/lib/i386-linux-gnu
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
/usr/local/lib/i686-linux-gnu
/lib/i686-linux-gnu
/usr/lib/i686-linux-gnu

$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 --help
[...]
Shared library search path:
  (libraries located via /etc/ld.so.cache)
  /lib/i386-linux-gnu (system search path)
  /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu (system search path)
  /lib (system search path)
  /usr/lib (system search path)

No subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories are searched.

Legacy HWCAP subdirectories under library search path directories:
  i686 (AT_PLATFORM; supported, searched)
  tls (supported, searched)
  sse2 (supported, searched)

So if you have '/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu' add on your ld.so.cache, the
<path>/i686/see will be search through legacy hwcap support.

> 
>>> Conversely how should I read the following:
>>>
>>> % sudo ldconfig -p | grep hwcap
>>>         libfoo.so.160 (libc6,x86-64, hwcap: 0x0004000000000000) =>
>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/haswell/libfoo.so.160
>>>         libfoo.so.160 (libc6,x86-64, hwcap: 0x0000000000000004) =>
>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/avx512_1/libfoo.so.160
>>>
>>> What does "haswell" / "avx512_1" subfolder implies in terms of gcc
>>> compile options ?
>>
>> It's complicated.  Nowdays, on x86-64, you can use
>> glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v3 and glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v4, which are designed to
>> correspond to -march=x86-64-v3 and -march=x86-64-v4, and x86-64-v4 is a
>> superset of x86-64-v3.
> 
> Ok, thanks for the update.
> 
> Could you just review what I see on my Debian/sid/armhf system:
> 
> % cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep Features | uniq
> Features        : half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls vfpv4
> idiva idivt lpae evtstrm
> % LD_DEBUG=libs LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. /bin/true
>    2964957:     find library=libc.so.6 [0]; searching
>    2964957:      search path=.          (LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
>    2964957:       trying file=./libc.so.6
>    2964957:      search cache=/etc/ld.so.cache
>    2964957:       trying file=/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     calling init: /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     calling init: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     initialize program: /bin/true
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     transferring control: /bin/true
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     calling fini:  [0]
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     calling fini: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 [0]
>    2964957:
>    2964957:
>    2964957:     calling fini: /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 [0]
>    2964957:
> 
> Based on the above, it seems glibc is setup to never search hwcaps
> optimized libraries on this system (even if neon/vfpv4 is supported by
> system).

This is a ubuntu22 armhf chroot on aarch64:

$ /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 --help
[...]
Shared library search path:
  (libraries located via /etc/ld.so.cache)
  /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf (system search path)
  /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf (system search path)
  /lib (system search path)
  /usr/lib (system search path)

No subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories are searched.

Legacy HWCAP subdirectories under library search path directories:
  v8l (AT_PLATFORM; supported, searched)
  tls (supported, searched)
  neon (supported, searched)
  vfp (supported, searched)

So both neon and vfp; I can not say exactly how debian is configured since both
ubuntu and debian carry out of tree patches; but I would expect them to be
similar regarding libc.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-31 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-31 10:06 Mathieu Malaterre
2023-08-31 11:24 ` Florian Weimer
2023-08-31 12:08   ` Mathieu Malaterre
2023-08-31 15:30     ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto [this message]
2023-09-01  7:18       ` Mathieu Malaterre
2023-08-31 17:20     ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90243b3d-740a-f391-089e-45d5ada7096f@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-help@sourceware.org \
    --cc=malat@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).