From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE8E385042A for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:13:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3EE8E385042A Received: from mail-pl1-f198.google.com (mail-pl1-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-kElWA-DtNb6Xe3OaLn-JHA-1; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:13:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kElWA-DtNb6Xe3OaLn-JHA-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f198.google.com with SMTP id i7-20020a17090332c7b0290124e63feb68so1981606plr.17 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:13:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UnStNdQqwIJF/Xb0d6tvo6EiKaH4O9ZGOVf747ZWJoc=; b=Ys2SKo0IxHhRam0+RnooMsvQMw9yLDttRN07IF6C31wy0jY87ysrhm0JofT+93Dhuj g+icw3jvirFvEzhCxXEi4n2ydBeOJmQEdjXk78rxj3LvYIKgC5iLp3IuKqr8f6NyD4de +sM7U3A7+cNXELeMIpe9T9T4bq41E+JO1pAX5rC9MLT2a45ftqkbEe8mh1I1zuVCtvqS mdj8Yqv7UNogf07asNve+Dz8hz6D0iSWPyceMOVFnTwddezbxL0EmqCwN0eZc2PlXfnb sumOkeOjlNFctRfXgamXziQK1yVYpWSbF7BvLe1GACD57VJZovpgjKZdEHQlfY/G50SD IeYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GU8ccl4eV1C5B12YYFMUka3G0bWhXF0u4C0yzMgRd2EQmwrvS cs2D+/LX5b3GVp1l/Th+q7KImfgEAOeNq1gI/Zgr2zjg7a60AbYFa4wF4adFizt0xx88liJm4uO nCSd//NAMUHKCHNkb2pQjL1g3v8Y3gaQ8Igc= X-Received: by 2002:a62:1c42:0:b029:3c3:59ee:6068 with SMTP id c63-20020a621c420000b02903c359ee6068mr9739932pfc.72.1628079191733; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:13:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzI+oijgQxRqRTmXPT6pDAmTUphbL46HjCNApW4eOlL6PFjNIcpEiKWupqgvPCWyMvVqJEVmQSpmApA38bvXog= X-Received: by 2002:a62:1c42:0:b029:3c3:59ee:6068 with SMTP id c63-20020a621c420000b02903c359ee6068mr9739913pfc.72.1628079191545; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:13:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5f1ce02f-fa75-aa46-bd2f-16f64d210db3@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:42:35 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 failed tests To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: Michael Brunnbauer , libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:13:15 -0000 On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:41 PM Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > Sorry, I meant the other tests (rt/tst-mqueue10 and time/tst-itimer), that's why > I think he is testing with 2.34. Also, the message title indicates it as well. OK, there are two sets of results, one for 2.33 and another for 2.34 :) Siddhesh