From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C326F3861030 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:09:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C326F3861030 Received: from mail-pj1-f70.google.com (mail-pj1-f70.google.com [209.85.216.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-335-nVSYRwXGPTukBwFKH_cOAA-1; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:09:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nVSYRwXGPTukBwFKH_cOAA-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f70.google.com with SMTP id o1-20020a17090aac01b029017730151351so2343273pjq.3 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:09:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M+slga9zg7uZhmMRMTOnJNQ8Ky3KW50BiJsLbUTPjVI=; b=gteqQSku86qV9V81wU0/VWDyWa2uglTuU4GNJpWSq2xHtDrlnEtisXtHBbzt4wX+Ci igmIVDULB8ypDF6g+9grCUDpNoGl+Ocm0JukISHlWXwiGAtbG8zH7GrmzsAaLA0ou58J QFczjePWb6g0VDIJHwXU2A/99fQNj92VEtD4gJlvmXkGAfM3yZ0+qoRdw1d+KLoZz7Ji 2HWyUGANMQk1qtI0KWUN8xi4I6Robehjy5mT43kHKRz2Kyb25ppWRCC11yB6XVnNxedI rivsg4w/YBE/gT5dlXXcSebJJzFCEzYFUSWtjrKxSmu6Q4Srp0BGDJk0Vl2Nx/qBFFoP /fvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oN58ZvhHQZBQlpsVQTyUum0qbrkrkI9YTKF4z2lMwY9DCJ8FA bHn4M25xWIaDRqR6CZUWlHfZ+nV/wDz0/ECLnuJ8h+fQFLQY4sa4GYEoFqD0y0LqBPB4rWWvdnr Gw9Nb4cPpyfinlzZocgeVj0eL4VuKjJLluHc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6e47:: with SMTP id s7mr28394028pjm.160.1628078973880; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl6kqhOKG8WaQNNN6Vdvlr1pto6MbWkg32m5r+51Cnl1SoBz4fePv4hGBOxsFHaNGI5YCfiyQZ/ndzUsyqEfo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6e47:: with SMTP id s7mr28394011pjm.160.1628078973635; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 05:09:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5f1ce02f-fa75-aa46-bd2f-16f64d210db3@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <5f1ce02f-fa75-aa46-bd2f-16f64d210db3@linaro.org> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:38:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 failed tests To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: Michael Brunnbauer , libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-help@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:09:37 -0000 On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:33 PM Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > On 04/08/2021 09:00, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:26 PM Adhemerval Zanella > > wrote: > >>> FAIL: malloc/tst-safe-linking > >> > >> Siddhesh has improved it to avoid some false positives, but from from > >> the commit message it seems that although unlikely it might still be > >> possible. Could you post the output to see if this is the case? > > > > I think Michael said he saw that failure in 2.33 and not on 2.34, > > which is how it should be with my fix. > > But the test was added only on 2.34 (assuming he is testing with the release > package). Micheal, are you using the source package or some repository revision? No, the safe linking test was added in 2.32. Siddhesh