From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.bonedaddy.net (smtp.bonedaddy.net [45.33.94.42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92DD63834539 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:01:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 92DD63834539 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=bonedaddy.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bonedaddy.net Received: by smtp.bonedaddy.net (Postfix, from userid 10001) id A908A30203E; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 07:56:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bonedaddy.net; s=mail; t=1691409365; bh=jd6HltsYVcNZrxpK7gbobuwUJNptmmaKnutjiCDMBQA=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Cje/omr30cLwcrCmnyhcMFBP7xdnmcn9JADnh9K0WSbINR3ryhS3SjCgNyO8swsC9 gAvTmzl4MfzI4mcEjZlft9suCqfx7Zdql9wEyGQnF3lpP4Hx/BhiN/abQZSt/cYUvB yhpVHYJVkGRApLw403Y3bVoBJRPv53S/o8ERZ6sEfPG3klW62RqFXQOUCz5CXxAEYf sY6r9/PaH+XnjJ9t12AHx3ZfCibAxQdRYDHfB9aXKG7AvLWeHRHb1ICK/BZRDJWu9z 5j7QEfsvZqJbwERXwq4MNFNO5oLNlMtmJ19I9i/ifZlZ4q2hAJK+VLfHZIJTKO8l2q d9I8p20pl1g6A== Message-ID: Subject: Re: is this a bug in glibc or readpst? From: Paul Wise To: Florian Weimer Cc: Libc-help In-Reply-To: <87edkfgjno.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> References: <2cefc4fa95dd439c2581f4f06d520c004cd33708.camel@bonedaddy.net> <875yf6nj43.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87ilitpv06.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <874jlbi5x0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <161b0b6563925702c3fda431ae703d0aa395b60a.camel@bonedaddy.net> <87edkfgjno.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-b/bgctNEYl/qQgRby+6P" Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 19:58:21 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4-1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --=-b/bgctNEYl/qQgRby+6P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 13:46 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I expect this is difficult to figure out for certain because of the > internal stream state may not be very clear unless you are familiar with > the code. 8-( I just got confirmation that the same issue is present on Alpine Linux, which uses the musl libc IIRC and it confirmed with musl-gcc on Debian. https://paste.debian.net/plainh/47ef35e3/ https://paste.debian.net/1288127/ > So I'd prefer to fix the glibc regression instead. OK. Given the likely widely varying behaviour in libc implementations, probably I should also fix the bug in libpst and readpst too. --=20 bye, pabs https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ --=-b/bgctNEYl/qQgRby+6P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmTQ3FoACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaMZrA//asd/i5xGcFPA5ASNXLjq/04rWyZPutsq99WxUoiKzOmc9gUrxa2JVR/o xNODi2JRxPem5mg+VCsNkv2K3gXcrhTtvC0ljcGh4LRPbRl2aJ/wsy3ZoVGlZbrq qaGerz/TccfTzA+uw00fDXvaKaZaiCzfjrdZnNPsjSVRY3RiEGGuywjdA+GU7Cph EBwOguRv8DpjgQKPbKhiwoKjdSCPWe3N9i0ME8qUecceRPiYDnLvautajYcLdqhr H4i7m4G4KfmxR8AzNAuiS7ElVbOvEX2ChGgmWfkQ+Qol1lDv/NqO9a9OuvTaq/KZ F/EsvLZZqPeJZGX85jkhUMygtFjVTCcruQkTdudTnhLak+kpKTvHqaQ5384ImKoz lbn+uBCpx39HE04BCBOMakAvg9nBfJZY4a8LaN9OEpwlm8DjshN7zqSiJM2VsXJ8 iHLyz0NOhoMGWTyaXoayMRNGliKiZXZINLnQJAyNnDZUYekBMgzqy1TWsZZSP3mc sdVisNHOLyEeg61Dm/2rcjZbULUhldlL9ff7jgFc2p6OGXs1ydmP0yqof4e3bwlv LMs1R5pTG71lPXA4sfzSCpUIF8tdtcryuvshJBImOvTMMRkv9GcvZYQMsFWGxaKz L+443+es2jKcgW6d/6XhyySA94YAd0wRxU5DPVCkV/rW2ZKaQS8= =tfky -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-b/bgctNEYl/qQgRby+6P--