From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-6430-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 123232 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2018 10:00:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 123179 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2018 10:00:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:libc-lo, HTo:U*libc-locales, QUOTATION, 2035
X-HELO: mail-wr1-f67.google.com
Return-Path: <myllynen@redhat.com>
Reply-To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Locales: Cyrillic -> ASCII transliteration table [BZ
 #2872] v2
To: Egor Kobylkin <egor@kobylkin.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
 libc-locales@sourceware.org, mfabian@redhat.com,
 Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
 Volodymyr Lisivka <vlisivka@gmail.com>, Max Kutny <mkutny@gmail.com>,
 danilo@gnome.org
References: <41532e13-a63d-5df1-ab37-05eb4d6c8d0a@kobylkin.com>
 <20180412224352.GB2911@altlinux.org>
 <bcb7fcd8-7f71-4f7e-6804-7c3f07d6d3ee@kobylkin.com>
From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <0f6c3b90-7af5-9575-1d07-aa73ce32f579@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:00:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bcb7fcd8-7f71-4f7e-6804-7c3f07d6d3ee@kobylkin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2

Hi,

Looks like there's one rule after all which might be debatable, I'll
just highlight it and let others to comment and decide what to do with it.

On 2018-10-11 01:29, Egor Kobylkin wrote:
> 
> +% RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
> +<U2019> <U2035>;<U0027>
translit_neutral (which is included by i18n) has:

% RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK
<U2019> <U0027> % not <U00B4> because it's often used as an apostrophe

In practice the end result might well be the same (since if U+2019 is
not available then probably U+2035 is neither and both rules produce
U+0027). However, given that translit_cyrillic would be included in
every locale, I'm not sure is this kind of minor discrepancy ok or not.

Thanks,

-- 
Marko Myllynen