From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22911 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2005 13:45:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 22880 invoked by uid 48); 8 Dec 2005 13:45:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20051208134531.22879.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ShupaS at rferl dot org" To: libc-locales@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> References: <20050616151127.1015.mikhailian@altern.org> Reply-To: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/1015] There is a need for an alternative belarusian locale X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 ------- Additional Comments From ShupaS at rferl dot org 2005-12-08 13:45 ------- Yury Tarasievich says: "I think, word "classic" here would be misleading. This qualifier of the aforementioned orthography is self-awarded and is inaccurate by any definition, as both qualifier and orthography aren't used or recognized as such by anybody excepting rather minor minority." I wouldn't like to start the old discussion with Mr Tarasevich who has some unexplained repugnance for that other orthography and has been the only one to fight it vehemently in all relevant net discussions. However, I want to draw your attention to an inaccuracy in his comment - upon which all his argumentation is built: Those who follow that "other" orthography are in slight MAJORITY (not in minor minority) on the Net. You can easily prove it - just google any pair of words spelled differently in the two orthographies. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.