Update of byn_ER for Unicode 4.1

Update of byn_ER for Unicode 4.1

[Daniel Yacob]

Greets,

Below is a patch that will update the byn_ER locale so that the 6th
month name is spelled properly.  The correct spelling was not possible
prior to the definition of the required character (U+131F) in Unicode
4.1 (March 31, 2005), so a common work around was applied:


--- byn_ER.cvs  2005-12-29 09:58:30.000000000 -0500
+++ byn_ER      2005-12-29 09:58:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
          "<U12AD><U1265><U120B>";/
          "<U134B><U1305><U12BA><U122A>";/
          "<U12AD><U1262><U1245><U122A>";/
-         "<U121D><U12AA><U12A4><U120D><U0020><U1275><U1313><U0305><U1292><U122A>";/
+         "<U121D><U12AA><U12A4><U120D><U0020><U1275><U131F><U1292><U122A>";/
          "<U12B0><U122D><U12A9>";/
          "<U121B><U122D><U12EB><U121D><U0020><U1275><U122A>";/
          "<U12EB><U12B8><U1292><U0020><U1218><U1233><U1245><U1208><U122A>";/

Re: Update of byn_ER for Unicode 4.1

[Denis Barbier]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:03:26AM -0600, Daniel Yacob wrote:
> Greets,
> 
> Below is a patch that will update the byn_ER locale so that the 6th
> month name is spelled properly.  The correct spelling was not possible
> prior to the definition of the required character (U+131F) in Unicode
> 4.1 (March 31, 2005), so a common work around was applied:

Hi,

this character has also to be added to localedata/charmaps/UTF-8,
otherwise it is transliterated into GWa by the following line
from ti_ET:
  <U131F>    <U0047><U0057><U0061>

In any case, you need to file a bug in bugzilla so that your patch
is being considered.

Denis