From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20231 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2008 18:01:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13769 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2008 17:46:35 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <48FB7244.7080800@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:01:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harshula CC: Pravin S , libc-locales@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: QUESTION: LC_COLLATE minimal requirements? References: <1223826729.4898.72.camel@B1.HOME> <764372c80810132241n21ec36e4uf8f13d1b5cc60d77@mail.gmail.com> <48F4DF40.2020101@redhat.com> <1224429227.18677.18.camel@B1.HOME> In-Reply-To: <1224429227.18677.18.camel@B1.HOME> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q4/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Harshula wrote: > The original question was "Does translit_start have an affect on > LC_COLLATE?" Transliteration has nothing to do with collation. Why should it? - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkj7ckQACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHSxpQCfUWbu2ZlxCkYdnG4hVZTgKsOW MtkAn07peGanR39l5/XCKQcGVGi++vX3 =7kG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----