From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60943 invoked by alias); 18 May 2019 07:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 60928 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2019 07:16:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=government, bank X-HELO: bear.g4t3.de To: libc-locales@sourceware.org References: From: Jakob Runge Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Subject: Re: Question regarding LC_MONETARY definitions for fr_CH and de_CH Message-ID: <55f0f3b8-6d58-b7aa-d554-a9c5af11c204@g4t3.de> Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 07:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NWV89X8QtMfQoPrxJh2V1PsqRlWKlcog3" X-SW-Source: 2019-q2/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NWV89X8QtMfQoPrxJh2V1PsqRlWKlcog3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ne1dIcX5AjKIoki4EmnLxSi6fziFsycw2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Jakob Runge To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Message-ID: <55f0f3b8-6d58-b7aa-d554-a9c5af11c204@g4t3.de> Subject: Re: Question regarding LC_MONETARY definitions for fr_CH and de_CH References: In-Reply-To: --ne1dIcX5AjKIoki4EmnLxSi6fziFsycw2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-HK Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1229 > The current data in fr_CH was contributed by Keld Simonsen, and you > should reach out to him also to discuss this issue. Thanks for the pointer - I will do that! > In general glibc tries to match published government standards about > language locales and particularly for number formats. >=20 > Quoting that CLDR is different is not a good justification. Yes, we > are trying hard to harmonize the glibc locales with CLDR since it > avoids confusion. However, we also need to understand which database > has it right, and correct the other. I understand that this makes perfectly sense and would also like to understand the source for this both in CLDR as well as glibc. > Are you a Swiss resident? Do you have experience with the locale > in question? >=20 No - I'm not a Swiss resident, and can't speak french - so I'm fairly removed from fr_CH. I tried to look this up on sites of the Swiss national bank and similar institutions but had no luck in my research. To the extend that I could get information from Swiss people it seemed to be conflicting and unclear whether it related to fr_CH in particular. So no - I wouldn't say that I have particular experience with the locale in question. All the best, Jakob --ne1dIcX5AjKIoki4EmnLxSi6fziFsycw2-- --NWV89X8QtMfQoPrxJh2V1PsqRlWKlcog3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 833 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEvJJnrcdUNR1yrOlsuVc/ljNSeIQFAlzfsREACgkQuVc/ljNS eITk2hAAumK5Hfx1q+ln8naoW6WAcNtBDxt+CaF3NLpcHGcRLJnxPmdtLsSmDdjq b2J/ELqqt8HPrq751tO9vBDHSdHcu21ljCMarpGJVx2bLkmLlMJQ+VL6+wotHyTd bdBC1M+f13CVZ9qVFTMFKQA4NthJUXVTVK8nKssuy1FceuPD2xhM64xWkMWWmdtO vs41QqGYMbJDQ1XMNH17tryEpRbUmMFRwRjFlRZr41XOqSxjSC4dpgGaKrBbzhnX sYboAzm8qfMIDbGohoNHEba8TmrYKQZZO89Qi3V29utxMj0On+1EqZ++M65Np5tI ykO1PxcjaGu0OoJkDfaQpTn6lTBSFPCBrpuyf3U8VqboRC/1Pbhpd6BzKLEommG0 ym7IpOjesq4QGD9fCQZGDjJ9peW9sLqVgLNYgs+eawDP2YhT0nwblbUyb0Z/3TTT eefp0V8u/8kREvyjbr0Dq5O1tarkR/hMG2eou6UXrLUpLOzBcgcNmGftrFCymHFQ AyPWH4aOMWDSkw0a0J29fOZ+b6I6nYv3SN09NPGilb0ed57aXxv7I84Ej1NP2n6Q boD6OgTS4Suj+lwiSVoZolz5pxKQr5rGcjG9mEQZLhG4CTw82w8XxcJjTmiOBhSJ iV/L0RU8UMVUMt7ofu6yV92XkLk7Q/u0Z+mKDDd4GdH2/49V5k8= =gkXc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NWV89X8QtMfQoPrxJh2V1PsqRlWKlcog3--