Re: QUESTION: LC_COLLATE minimal requirements?

["Pravin S" <pravin.d.s@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

2008/10/19 Harshula <harshula@gmail.com>:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:04 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
>> >> Q1) Is it a requirement to use the collating-symbol keyword to define
>> >> ALL symbols? If not, is this patch sufficient and acceptable for glibc?
>> >> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/iso14651_t1_common-glibc.patch?root=sinhala&view=log
>>
>> It's better to follow the example of the other languages.  This results
>> in better tables.  And it's trivial.  Just use
>>
>>    <U0DF4>   <U0DF4>;<BAS>;<MIN>;IGNORE
>>
>> etc
>
> Thanks, I've made the changes.
>
> Patch:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/iso14651_t1_common-glibc.patch?root=sinhala&view=log
>
> Testcase:
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/mysql-data-sinhala.txt?root=sinhala&view=log
>
> Correct output from 'sort':
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/sinhala/patches/glibc-collation-correct.txt?root=sinhala&view=log
>
>

Harshula I think,
It will be nice if you filed bug @
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=glibc
and submit patch there, it will be good for tracking





Thanks & Regards,
----------------------
Pravin Satpute