From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64821 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2020 13:13:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 62520 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2020 13:13:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,FREEMAIL_FROM,GARBLED_BODY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=viewed, sk:digital, classical X-HELO: mail-wm1-f46.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; bh=9HH8DJ6wXjUcXU5tYYnYbuidx7K4oc6ldYTXCDDpLLs=; b=i2XBmBut7sY5r8wGXJJ2obHSgguDPiCj/6NsdAQsu5mPEtqNWSPLKE4ijQzZclv3Tb A4fMDhKU44P+MqkukpvkkyqDc1K8YYTBJMcGk5tUykEZTje619dD7oUhFlTPBHXDnHRN IpEX2I449FOrQwNfogNDfYqqLM5l522mFp+PnmXZLWyb9Fn1J6nItYeLYid8MpMt89yN JEcyqeIp1ABk/qkaFIX57x5TkpA/fCou6IN6sapWbvzQvVb9SxtPjQb/Rr7cYVDSr40l PhHtEKwSWkKTSDJHB/TeM96EtKl7k9rjB+rc+b2D2piOINpoV5tdUcvQcuRvjq0jltXc 2LnQ== Return-Path: Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <2362D44A-F3B5-4148-84AD-1298AA797F84@gmail.com> References: <074EA04E-D87F-4D50-A6B9-1358C40C46F5@gmail.com> <1aef866f-1c9a-5557-0823-3c065c844197@redhat.com> <295400271.32249.1582576580507@poczta.nazwa.pl> <2362D44A-F3B5-4148-84AD-1298AA797F84@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: be-tarask To: Rafal Luzynski ,libc-locales@sourceware.org From: Zmicer Turok Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00054.txt Also in CLDR is missing be-Latn, but but it exists in the libc. https://gi= thub.com/unicode-org/cldr/tree/master/common/main On 25 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=B3=D0=B0 2020 08.07.01 GMT+03:00, Zmicer = Turok wrote: >Tara=C5=A1kievica is not supported by any official and/or scientific >institution, but there are philologists and writers who use this >spelling. There are much more, the weight of those who use be-latn. >There are as many users. Approximate activity can be viewed in the >Wikipedia. The layout is no different from "be", there are necessary >chars. Sense to add a locale exists. > >On 24 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=B3=D0=B0 2020 23.36.20 GMT+03:00, Rafal = Luzynski > wrote: >>24.02.2020 16:18 Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 2/24/20 10:02 AM, Zmicer Turok wrote: >>> > Hi, tell me please, is it possible to add a locale be-tarask for >>> > Belarusian? >>>=20 >>> Locales can certainly be added if people are willing to do the work >>to add >>> them. >>>=20 >>> Can you please explain what be-tarask would represent? >> >>be-tarask is an alternative (classical, old) spelling of Belarusian >>language >>using the Cyrillic script (same as be_BY). [1] >> >>> We currently have be_BY and be_BY@latin (latin script version). >> >>The bug report and the discussion is here: [2] >> >>Last time I asked a native speaker I was told that less and less >people >>use >>that spelling so it is not worth adding. Has anything changed >>recently? >> Are >>there people willing to use it? >> >>Another obstacle is that the variant is not supported by CLDR. Also >>I'm >>not sure if Tara=C5=A1kievica is supported by any official and/or >scientific >>institution. It may be difficult to verify the correctness of the >>data. >>However, if we overcome these difficulties adding be_BY@tarask is >>possible. >> >>Regards, >> >>Rafal >> >> >>[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara%C5%A1kievica >>[2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1015