From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97025 invoked by alias); 18 May 2019 00:13:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 97000 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2019 00:13:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=locales, love X-HELO: bear.g4t3.de To: libc-locales@sourceware.org From: Jakob Runge Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Subject: Question regarding LC_MONETARY definitions for fr_CH and de_CH Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 00:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fLOBdauu4p6mxJKf1gh1AQ7NNto3g7yPA" X-SW-Source: 2019-q2/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fLOBdauu4p6mxJKf1gh1AQ7NNto3g7yPA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="eCVRlkUL1EFZjRv9rElgFOD9CsGxEbIHV"; protected-headers="v1" From: Jakob Runge To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Message-ID: Subject: Question regarding LC_MONETARY definitions for fr_CH and de_CH --eCVRlkUL1EFZjRv9rElgFOD9CsGxEbIHV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-HK Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1408 Hello, given that I'm new to this I hope that I don't tread on anyone's toes and have found the right place for my question. If not I'd be happy for any advise. I've recently stumbled [1] over the LC_MONETARY definitions for fr_CH and because fr_CH copies these from de_CH also over the ones from de_CH. If I'm not completely mistaken these seem to be located in 'localedata/locales/fr_CH' and 'localedata/locales/de_CH' respectively. When comparing the 'p_cs_precedes' and 'n_cs_precedes' settings against the pages [2,3] from the unicode cldr survey-tool [4] I found what to appears to be a mismatch to me for fr_CH. That is for fr_CH the currency format in the CLDR appears to be defined as '#,##0.00 =C2=A4' which would be '1=E2=80=AF295.00 CHF' or '-1=E2=80=AF2= 95.00 CHF', but for 'localedata/locales/fr_CH' the values of 'p_cs_precedes' and 'n_cs_precedes' would be 1 on the current master commit (1f50f2a). If my observations are correct it would seem to me that the 'p_cs_precedes' and 'n_cs_precedes' for fr_CH should be adjusted. I'd love to read confirmation or correction on this. All the best, Jakob [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/q/56057751/448591 [2]: https://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/fr_CH/Number_Formatting_Patterns/24a93b= 3d14ba17b2 [3]: https://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/de_CH/Number_Formatting_Patterns/53687a= 25c19b6481 [4]: http://cldr.unicode.org/index/survey-tool --eCVRlkUL1EFZjRv9rElgFOD9CsGxEbIHV-- --fLOBdauu4p6mxJKf1gh1AQ7NNto3g7yPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 833 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEvJJnrcdUNR1yrOlsuVc/ljNSeIQFAlzfTfoACgkQuVc/ljNS eIRRPRAA1xfzOOso5aOxgB4cYFe3ER0KleXognl1UFeBR1AhbjnzueL5Wixkruvr x9UtunDyBT+YrjV5hii9ZbIF0CnaIHOhclCvNqcewh7ho7xmvOh6tqUP/D7CHHDD ziutrRGm1j1KHLrEP5dWCfl5CKwhZqvdRxLmsAP3IG9TqXjOwcnKFjDHWgq6lL+m SjDOsclNXI+o77g91XfBjOvxro0CKNajWRHW0yHHjXVx1FD2DgpRkw7LxhCRQ3EZ 3ESH2ESHKy3M/HtD8ZqNVk2VB1J3wkhCL3refrv2an1VQIDzmW58cKIqOiZMli+y NN84xGkmMRZe+V5FEQzZrn/HlmQWOAN1v32rge6edwSYhh0WU6dOIwLnbIEwXpMz yq4vMT/CWFcSNNAzOuJAv3IMoj58ltD89DVycUAUpLxij90hfGlBKa2A6b/7inyo /0cDxyTwF2/W15pfVpt7X00L+j3muK/o735pHdycvVdS1IB1tjfh6QsKBzjKv3mW /hqKD9ZYCmiwltoqASNnW9NX/U8PiN/YTfasE1Lsm5FxoihDmcTI8bswnX1L+z1G CY0+unWP7JHUTDbvvuG8ZskPllciD0xSsNrCwy8N5o3Xar98iGu/EQ9tmKWCa7i6 nC0V3K4RMQDrjfI/T5+DOmeR4Js+yoAfQukSnojC7Y9tBEUfRk4= =+uMb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fLOBdauu4p6mxJKf1gh1AQ7NNto3g7yPA--