From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-4055-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 622 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2016 13:34:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 44021 invoked by uid 55); 14 Jan 2016 13:32:02 -0000
From: "keld at keldix dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/10871] ru_RU: 'mon' array should contain both
 nominative and genitive cases
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: keld at keldix dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-10871-716-1mZ6ccYGcK@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-10871-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-10871-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D10871

--- Comment #23 from keld at keldix dot com <keld at keldix dot com> ---
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:51:04PM +0000, vapier at gentoo dot org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D10871
>=20
> --- Comment #22 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> ---
> (In reply to keld@keldix.com from comment #21)
>=20
> running s/POSIX/ISO TR 30112/ on my comment doesn't change my point.  we =
should
> not be inventing our own new behavior here when there's long standing
> precedence.

If the argument is that BSD already has this feature and we should follow t=
heir
specs, then I agree, and then I propose that we add this to 30112.

best regards
keld

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.