From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22427 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2019 11:59:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22287 invoked by uid 55); 2 Jan 2019 11:59:46 -0000 From: "keld at keldix dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/14641] LC_NAME: deprecate locale category Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: keld at keldix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14641 --- Comment #41 from keld at keldix dot com --- if you dont belive in th work we do her then go join cldr - if you are allo= wed to participate!! and let us do our work your remarko on this being a bginning - indicates that you do not grasp the nature of i18n there are always things to do. keld On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:05:34AM +0000, vapier at gentoo dot org wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14641 >=20 > --- Comment #39 from Mike Frysinger --- > (In reply to keld@keldix.com from comment #38) >=20 > the standard itself already admits defeat: > The specification below should be regarded as a starting point for this > problem. >=20 > i doubt people writing booking systems are relying on the locale data pro= vided > by glibc. instead they're using databases they found online or are provi= ded by > another company. >=20 > i don't think this level of detail is appropriate anymore in any standard= s body > or C library. these processes are glacial at best. having focused libs = that > are actively developed/updated is the common process nowadays. the CLDR = as an > example does two full releases a year (with point fixes and betas on top = of > that). by comparison, ISO 3122 has like one release every 5+ years ? >=20 > --=20 > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.