From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-5354-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8049 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2017 15:14:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 5575 invoked by uid 48); 8 Aug 2017 15:14:16 -0000
From: "bluebat at member dot fsf.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/17563] cmn_TW: add hanzi collation
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bluebat at member dot fsf.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-17563-716-C2LNgChxmP@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-17563-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-17563-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2017-q3/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17563

--- Comment #7 from Wei-Lun Chao <bluebat at member dot fsf.org> ---
(In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #6)
> Should the new collation also be used for zh_TW, or only
> for cmn_TW.
> By the way, what is the difference between zh_TW=20
> and cmn_TW, isn=E2=80=99t both Mandarin?

As reasons for bug 15963, those 14 languages have been behind the
macro-language "zh" for a long time. Technically zh_TW and cmn_TW are the s=
ame,
but for fairness, IMHO, the locale zh_TW should be deprecated and replaced =
with
cmn_TW and other chinese locales.

Personally I would like to differentiate cmn from zh with this radical patc=
h,
which may be followed by similar patches against nan_TW, hak_TW, lzh_TW and
yue_HK.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.