From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97817 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2016 16:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 86844 invoked by uid 55); 20 Dec 2016 16:01:08 -0000 From: "keld at keldix dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/20664] Unexpected collation in en_US.UTF-8, different to ICU CLDR Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.23 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: keld at keldix dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20664 --- Comment #4 from keld at keldix dot com --- On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:10:56PM +0000, carlos at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20664 >=20 > Carlos O'Donell changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > Last reconfirmed| |2016-10-03 > CC| |carlos at redhat dot com > Ever confirmed|0 |1 >=20 > --- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell --- > Going forward we want glibc to track CLDR more closely. Therefore if you = can > find a glibc version that exhibits meaningful difference between CLDR, th= en > please file a report, like this one. >=20 > However, you have too many moving pieces for us to validate this, for exa= mple > sort is not a good test case because it might itself not use glibc's coll= ation > tables for sorting. >=20 > Can you construct a test case with strcoll that exhibits this problem? I do not think we should aim at following CLDR closely, but we should minim= ize differences. I actually think we should get CLDR to follow us more closely:= -) Bestregards keld --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.