From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-4785-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 43203 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2016 21:08:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 86923 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2016 19:15:50 -0000
From: "carlos at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/20664] Unexpected collation in en_US.UTF-8,
 different to ICU CLDR
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.23
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-20664-716-rD6iS0GgWR@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-20664-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-20664-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2016-q4/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20664

--- Comment #5 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to keld@keldix.com from comment #4)
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:10:56PM +0000, carlos at redhat dot com wrote:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20664
> > Can you construct a test case with strcoll that exhibits this problem?
>=20
> I do not think we should aim at following CLDR closely, but we should
> minimize
> differences. I actually think we should get CLDR to follow us more closel=
y:-)

I certainly agree that harmonization between both projects would be a great
goal. Having the best of both projects would be great. While I say "followi=
ng
CLDR" what I mean is probably more accurate to say "harmonized with CLDR." =
So I
will endeavour to use such language in the future.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.