From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97063 invoked by alias); 9 May 2017 23:38:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17230 invoked by uid 48); 9 May 2017 23:25:45 -0000 From: "digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/21217] localedata: Update months from CLDR-31 Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 23:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-q2/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21217 --- Comment #16 from Rafal Luzynski = --- (In reply to =D0=9C=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BE=D1=88 =D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2= =D0=B8=D1=9B from comment #15) > [...] > "sr@latin" is automagically generated from "sr" (thus the changes will be > overwritten). Are you sure this is also true in glibc project? I haven't found such mecha= nism here. > So changes for "sr" would be: > =D1=98=D1=83=D0=BD=D0=B8 > =D1=98=D1=83=D0=BD > =D1=98=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=B8 > =D1=98=D1=83=D0=BB Serbian Cyrillic months are already "=D1=98=D1=83=D0=BD" and "=D1=98=D1=83= =D0=BB" both in CLDR [1] and glibc, I guess this is correct. But Serbian Latin are "jun" and "jul" in CLDR [2] while "juni" and "juli" in glibc. I think you can test this in your compute= r. The question is whether the change from "juni" to "jun" and "juli" to "jul"= in Serbian Latin is correct and, while at this, whether the current Serbian Cyrillic months "=D1=98=D1=83=D0=BD" and "=D1=98=D1=83=D0=BB" are correct a= nd require no change. This all applies to the full month names in the nominative case. [1] http://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/sr/Gregorian/ [2] http://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/sr_Latn/Gregorian/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.