From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-6019-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 66718 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2018 10:50:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 66214 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jan 2018 10:50:46 -0000
From: "elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/21547] Tibetan script collation broken (Dzongkha and
 Tibetan)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.24
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-21547-716-q6ATLuNV42@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-21547-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-21547-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2018-q1/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21547

--- Comment #5 from Elie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu> ---
Hello Fabian,

Thanks a lot for your thorough review, that's appreciated!

I have to say I don't really understand the second part, why would line 30
causes =E0=BD=82=E0=BD=89 to be sorted after =E0=BD=82=E0=BD=89=E0=BE=AB ? =
can you elaborate a little bit?

Anyways, a solution I suppose is to remove line 7 and have line 30 be:

&=E0=BD=89<<=E0=BE=8B=E0=BE=99<=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=89<=E0=BD=82=E0=BD=89=E0=BE=
=AB<=E0=BD=98=E0=BD=89<=E0=BD=A2=E0=BE=99=3D=E0=BD=AA=E0=BE=99<=E0=BD=A6=E0=
=BE=99<=E0=BD=96=E0=BD=A2=E0=BE=99=3D=E0=BD=96=E0=BD=AA=E0=BE=99<=E0=BD=96=
=E0=BD=A6=E0=BE=99

would that solve the problem? I can elaborate a bit on why lines 4 to 18 are
separated from the rest if you want, but I think it will be helpful to
understand your point of view a bit better first.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.