From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17721 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2017 07:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17528 invoked by uid 48); 6 Dec 2017 07:12:49 -0000 From: "maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsb2NhbGVkYXRhLzIyNTUwXSBlc19FUyBsb2NhbGUgKGFuZCAgb3Ro?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXIgZXNfKiBsb2NhbGVzKTogIGNvbGxhdGlvbiBzaG91bGQgdHJlYXQgw7Eg?= =?UTF-8?B?IGFzIGEgcHJpbWFyeSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY2hhcmFjdGVyLCAgc3luYyB0aGUg?= =?UTF-8?B?Y29sbGF0aW9uIGZvciBTcGFuaXNoIHdpdGggQ0xEUg==?= Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 07:12:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-q4/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22550 --- Comment #7 from Mike FABIAN --- (In reply to H=C3=A9ctor M. Monacci from comment #6) > The =C3=91 letter still does. CH doesn't. LL doesn't. I think H=C3=A9ctor is right here and we should only make =C3=91 special in= *all* Spanish locales. Until now, only es_US (and es_EC which did copy "es_US") do anything special at all for the collation. es_US does treat =C3=91, CH, and LL as special. So if we only treat =C3=91 as special from now on, this is certainly an improvement for most Spanish locales over the current state. And it follows the current official rules. It could be a regression only for user of es_US and es_EC which are used to the traditional sorting rules. Overall I think going with the current official rules is better than using the traditional rules for some random number of es_* locales where we just guess that the users of these locales would like the tradtional rules. Carlos and H=C3=A9ctor are both from Argentina, Carlos prefers the traditional rules and H=C3=A9ctor the current rules. So we have a disagreement for es_AR already. In case of such a disagreement, I think it is best just to follow the official rules. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.