From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-5967-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28887 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2017 15:18:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28810 invoked by uid 48); 5 Dec 2017 15:18:30 -0000
From: "carlos at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject:
 =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsb2NhbGVkYXRhLzIyNTUwXSBlc19FUyBsb2NhbGUgKGFuZCAgb3Ro?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZXIgZXNfKiBsb2NhbGVzKTogIGNvbGxhdGlvbiBzaG91bGQgdHJlYXQgw7Eg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IGFzIGEgcHJpbWFyeSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY2hhcmFjdGVyLCAgc3luYyB0aGUg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Y29sbGF0aW9uIGZvciBTcGFuaXNoIHdpdGggQ0xEUg==?=
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-22550-716-7QlazxYyPu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22550-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22550-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2017-q4/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22550

--- Comment #2 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #1)
> The es_US locale currently implements the =E2=80=9Ctraditional=E2=80=9D s=
ort order.
> Do we want that?:

Yes. I'm Argentine, and I would expect the traditional sort order.

Even though 'ch' is not in common use, the traditional sort order is
appropriate for all Spanish locales.

We should harmonize the collation across all es locales.

We may need to offer a post-2010 "new style" collation locale, but we need =
to
get feedback from our users.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.