From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32784 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2017 11:35:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32727 invoked by uid 55); 9 Dec 2017 11:35:49 -0000 From: "maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsb2NhbGVkYXRhLzIyNTUwXSBlc19FUyBsb2NhbGUgKGFuZCAgb3Ro?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXIgZXNfKiBsb2NhbGVzKTogIGNvbGxhdGlvbiBzaG91bGQgdHJlYXQgw7Eg?= =?UTF-8?B?IGFzIGEgcHJpbWFyeSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY2hhcmFjdGVyLCAgc3luYyB0aGUg?= =?UTF-8?B?Y29sbGF0aW9uIGZvciBTcGFuaXNoIHdpdGggQ0xEUg==?= Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 11:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-q4/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22550 --- Comment #14 from Mike FABIAN --- I agree. On 9 Dec 2017 12:32, "hector.monacci at gmail dot com" < sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> wrote: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22550 --- Comment #13 from H=C3=A9ctor M. Monacci --- I have just attached another interesting proof. Back in 1992, i.e., years before the Agreement was reached in 1994, there were some very prestigious dictionaries that already used the new alphabet (without CH and LL as independent letters). The image is from page 241 of hte Gran Diccionario Salvat, originally published in Barcelona. My copy is from a local edition in Buenos Aires. The newspaper La Naci=C3=B3n published it as a series of installments. The fact that, back in this publication of 1992, only the =C3=91 was a spec= ial Spanish character (and not CH and LL) didn't upset anybody. It is a quarter of a century since. It is time to move on. Please, can we agree on this? We need =C3=91 to be treated properly under es_* locales, and especially un= der LC_COLLATE sections. And we need to abandon support, at least as default, for CH and LL as independent letters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You reported the bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.