From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-locales-return-6048-listarch-libc-locales=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 35884 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2018 11:01:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-locales-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-locales@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-locales-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 35822 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2018 11:01:52 -0000
From: "maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/22646] redundant data (LC_TIME) for es_CL, es_CU,
 es_EC and es_BO
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.26
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: security-
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-22646-716-ZjPe1mUWKO@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22646-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22646-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2018-q1/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22646

Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |maiku.fabian at gmail dot =
com

--- Comment #5 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Akhilesh Kumar from comment #4)
> > ... therefore copy "es_ES" everywhere (where applicable, of course) inc=
luding es_BO.
>=20
> I also think copying LC_TIME from es_ES may not good, Because week set fo=
r=20
> es_CL, es_CU,  es_EC  and es_BO is same but different for es_ES.
>=20
>=20
> week 7;19971130;4  >> es_ES=20
> week 7;19971130;1  >> es_CL
> week 7;19971130;1  >> es_CU
> week 7;19971130;1  >> es_EC
> week 7;19971130;1  >> es_BO

At the moment, es_CL, es_CU, es_EC, and es_BO have identical LC_TIME,
so it is OK to copy from one of them.

It would be interesting to check why MINWEEKLEN  is 4 in es_ES
and 1 in es_CL, es_CU, es_EC, and es_BO. Is this correct or is
it a mistake.

At the moment it is OK to use the suggested copy, I think,=20
it shows more clearly that LC_TIME is identical in these 4 locales
at the moment.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.