From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F085E3857029; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:46:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F085E3857029
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1692607604;
	bh=gW2T/87ep8FuKU0LQv3R4CbZJzVDcGHVZQx3Kxvjg6s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gw2/BmpjZoeTT978SJ/3F7Nw4COKZTiljnVgkEpVMaS/SFe/bSduIPoQ+fEbiZRko
	 MyNmafncfmu8Kn3io5/8kGJjuyJhDF7jHkY6rEfLOSp+RA/PwYT6R/2XnyAv0DsF/A
	 ondx8Hpxf+2GCcCVyuOjLeIblSgU37Vx0BK+RdoY=
From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: libc-locales@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug localedata/30761] zh-Hans: new locale
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:46:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc
X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fweimer at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30761-716-b7OdXtsHVN@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30761-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30761-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <libc-locales.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30761

--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
This part does not make sense to me, sorry:

=E2=80=9C
the most user of zh-Hans/zh-Hant are Chinese, for convenient the locale sti=
ll
use CNY as the currency symbol.
=E2=80=9D

What's the difference to the existing zh_CN and zh_HK locales? Just the nam=
e?

As I already said, we are not going to adopt the RFC 5646 scheme. The glibc
convention is actually a POSIX convention and widely used. I do not know why
the IETF standardized a completely new scheme; I assume they never intended=
 to
apply it to locale names.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=