From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F2B993858C5E; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:53:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2B993858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1692672793; bh=gadN+FzXm2kg43MJ6eaXCNkTXz2oN75ZYmqUleI2hCI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kyJ5CeDPdL9vCmRbPGI4tAz/CJq8Gl6FhC3UpXM/bAJySxKQKFoYtrkF0RzbDivcP MBLk4ufOAmqnyFCbzzl81NtaQ2V6eowQdsRY0YEuNSk97Aj8CLmCX9H6WxSce1MJBD BSQ3J18/QPVND5Au96eU8bjPV7Bb/TMlG32+8z4Q= From: "taozuhong at hotmail dot com" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/30761] zh-Hans: new locale Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 02:53:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: taozuhong at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30761 --- Comment #14 from taozuhong --- > What's the difference to the existing zh_CN and zh_HK locales? Just the n= ame? Let's make it simple ASAP: zh_CN =3D Simplified Chinese + China mainland zh_HK =3D Traditional Chinese + China Hong Kong zh_TW =3D Traditional Chinese + Chinese Taiwan zh_MO =3D Traditional Chinese + China Macau zh_Hans =3D (zh_CN + zh_HK + zh_TW + zh_MO + zh_SG + Simplified Chinese + O= thers if want Simplified Chinese) zh_Hant =3D (zh_CN + zh_HK + zh_TW + zh_MO + zh_SG + Traditional Chinese + = Others if want Traditional Chinese) the current locale could map to zh_Hans/zh_Hant: zh_CN =3D zh_Hans_CN cmn_CN =3D zh_Hans_CN wuu_CN =3D zh_Hans_CN zh_HK =3D zh_Hant_HK cmn_HK =3D zh_Hant_HK yue_HK =3D zh_Hant_HK zh_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW cmn-TW =3D zh_Hant_TW cmn_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW nan_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW hak_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW lzh_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW yue_TW =3D zh_Hant_TW So it we keep use zh_CN/zh_HK locale names scheme, then we must add the fol= low locale names: Simplified Chinese cmn: zh_CN(China mainland), zh-SG (Singapore), zh-MY (Malaysia), zh-ID (Indonesia), ...... wuu: wuu_CN(China mainland) yue: maybe exist nan: maybe exist hak: maybe exist lzh: maybe exist Traditional Chinese cmn: zh_TW (Chinese Taiwan), zh_HK (China Hong Kong), zh_MO (China Macau), ...... yue: yue_HK(China Hong Kong) nan: nan_TW(Chinese Taiwan) hak: hak_TW(Chinese Taiwan) lzh: lzh_TW(Chinese Taiwan) yue: yue_TW(Chinese Taiwan) While you are facing the choices, which one will be choiced? zh_Hans/zh_Hant VS zh_CN/zh_HK/zh_TW/zh_SG/zh_MY/zh_ID/zh_MO/yue_HK/nan_TW/hzk_TW/wuu_CN/.... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=