From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34135 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2018 00:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-locales-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-locales-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 34065 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jun 2018 00:50:02 -0000 From: "joerg_bugzilla_sourceware at reisenweber dot net" To: libc-locales@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug localedata/4628] Provide rump locales with ISO 8601 variants for use with LC_TIME Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 00:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: glibc X-Bugzilla-Component: localedata X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joerg_bugzilla_sourceware at reisenweber dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: security- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2018-q2/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D4628 Koerg Reisenweber change= d: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg_bugzilla_sourceware@r | |eisenweber.net --- Comment #19 from Koerg Reisenweber --- (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #16) [...] > Which might look like `export LC_TIME=3Den_US:C@iso8601` which says use US > English language information for language-specific requirements, but > consider the territory to be generic and following ISO 8601. >=20 > I expect language specific entries would be: > - abday > - day > - abmon > - mon >=20 > I expect the territory specific entries would be: > - week > - d_t_fmt > - d_fmt > - t_fmt > - t_fmt_ampm > - am_pm >=20 > This is as Mike argues in his email. >=20 > In which case users would see their language-specific day names, month > names, etc, but the start of the week is always going to be Monday per > ISO8601, and date and time formats will be ISO8601. >=20 > The outliers are t_fmt_ampm, which doesn't exist in ISO8601, so it should > IMO be identical to t_fmt, and am_pm should be an empty set. >=20 > Thus do we all agree that we *don't* want ISO 8601? >=20 > That what we really want is layered locales with language/territory layer= ing? >=20 > If you object, please describe some other kind of model that you're > considering. sounds excellent, any progress on this? /jOERG --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.