From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9284 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 13:34:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 9182 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2012 13:34:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:34:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2RDYMYe030591 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:34:22 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.146] (ovpn-113-146.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.146]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2RDYLNs004608; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:34:21 -0400 Subject: Re: glibc am33 and cris architectures From: Mark Salter To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Alexandre Oliva , libc-ports@sourceware.org, hp@axis.com Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1332855262.22154.12.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 17:09 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > I've long been out of touch WRT am33, but I finally brought this up > > within Red Hat folks that are involved with it. > > > > Mark Salter volunteered to contribute the updates he'd worked on, but > > that had failed to be contributed because I failed to review the TLS > > support patches for GCC and binutils (sorry) > > > > So, instead of removing the port, I suggest we name Mark maintainer of > > the am33 port. Any objections? > > I haven't seen any objections; obviously some pretty large patches will be > needed to bring the port up to date, replace the Linuxthreads port by an > NPTL port and generally update sysdeps files for several years of libc > changes that involve all-targets updates, so they are in sync with the > libc versions again. And then he'll need to keep a watch on libc commits > for any that require am33 updates to keep am33 in sync, and make such > updates to the port as and when such libc commits are made. > I have patches which add NPTL to glibc 2.9 and I'm in the process of bringing those forward to the devel head. And yes, going forward I intend to keep an eye on the glibc devel and add am33 glibc to the things I regularly build and test. --Mark