From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1239 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2012 16:18:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 1230 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2012 16:18:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:18:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5FGIHBP028004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.19] ([10.3.113.19]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5FGIGKe020455; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:17 -0400 Subject: Re: Ports state for 2.16 regarding global changes From: Mark Salter To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, Mike Frysinger , Andreas Schwab , Richard Henderson , "Carlos O'Donell" Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1339777097.32384.35.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:52 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > * am33: generally massively out of date and I have not tried to > identify specific changes needed. I have been working on getting this updated. ATM, I'm blocked waiting on a fix for a bug in the gcc patch adding am33 tls support. I expect to be past this sometime next week so I can actually start testing things. Would it be helpful to go ahead and post the glibc patches now or wait until I get them tested? --Mark