public inbox for libc-ports@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@mips.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Cc: "libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, mips] Faster strcmp for mips
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384541575.2484.110.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2sS1jDnPP2hKn6u-nnvAnKgwQrrVUsDUrGWjyUu8+EBXZjgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 13:47 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steve Ellcey <sellcey@mips.com> wrote:
> > This means it could be loading bytes beyond the end of the strings being
> > compared but it looks like other architecture specific strcmp functions
> > are also doing this optimization and the newlib version of strcmp also does
> > this.
> 
> I thought that doing so was dangerous? I'm pretty sure we've been trying
> to fix such "load bytes beyond the end of the string" issues because you
> could have a string that straddles a page boundary with the next page
> unmapped and such an optimized routine would fault on a read from the
> unmapped page.
> 
> How do you plan to fix that?
> 
> Cheers,
> Carlos.

I think the assumption has been that if an aligned word contains at
least one byte of the string, it is OK to read that entire word.  I
don't think a single aligned word (4 or 8 bytes depending on the
architecture) can straddle a page boundary.  If the word was unaligned,
then I think it could straddle a page boundary and you could get into
trouble.

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@mips.com


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-15 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-14 21:25 Steve Ellcey
2013-11-14 23:14 ` Ondřej Bílka
2013-11-15 18:21   ` Steve Ellcey
2013-11-15 19:02     ` Ondřej Bílka
2013-11-18 23:50       ` Steve Ellcey
2013-11-19  2:32         ` Ondřej Bílka
2013-11-15 18:48 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-11-15 18:53   ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2013-11-15 18:59     ` Carlos O'Donell
2015-02-19  7:25 ` Matt Turner
2015-02-19 18:12   ` Steve Ellcey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384541575.2484.110.camel@ubuntu-sellcey \
    --to=sellcey@mips.com \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).