From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-1894-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25336 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 21:33:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25328 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 21:33:54 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:33:51 +0000
Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9209C1B4043;	Mon,  7 Mar 2011 21:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: libc-ports@sourceware.org, ams@gnu.org
Subject: Re: tarball?
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:33:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; )
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
References: <E1PvFcz-0001WA-VY@fencepost.gnu.org> <AANLkTinESenCESc8_tHCTMYi0khk6+kTcEpYsWhn=dqi@mail.gmail.com> <E1PwJRS-0007Mn-O9@fencepost.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1PwJRS-0007Mn-O9@fencepost.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;  boundary="nextPart1466338.iOKxtzSX5R";  protocol="application/pgp-signature";  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201103071633.25140.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2


--nextPart1466338.iOKxtzSX5R
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 319

On Sunday, March 06, 2011 14:16:34 Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
>    > Does anyone object to me rolling a glibc-ports tarball?
>=20
>    Not at all. It was on my todo list, but it's pretty low on the priority
> list :-(
>=20
> Done.

thanks !
-mike

--nextPart1466338.iOKxtzSX5R
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-length: 836

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=HHUc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1466338.iOKxtzSX5R--